Singapore records another year of record fraud losses
Fraud statistics published in 2025 confirmed what victim services already knew: losses in Singapore hit record levels, with crypto-linked cases growing faster than every other category.
What the numbers show
Aggregate losses reached new highs in Singapore, but the more telling figure is per-case: crypto fraud now extracts multiples of traditional payment fraud, because victims are persuaded to move "investments" repeatedly.
Under-reporting remains the norm — shame and futility keep many victims silent, which starves enforcement of data and lets rings operate longer.
Where the money goes
Tracing work shows the same architecture behind many brands: deposits pool at a handful of exchanges, pass through mixers, and exit through OTC desks. The brands are disposable; the infrastructure is not.
Singapore victims should act within hours: under the Shared Responsibility Framework, banks and telcos face duties to intervene, but a fast police report anchors the case.
The practical takeaway
For Singapore victims, the statistics carry one message: you are not alone, and the machinery for cases — ScamShield and the Singapore Police Force, the Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF) duties, tracing — exists precisely because the volume is real.
Early action is the multiplier. The gap between a case filed in days and one filed in months is often the difference between frozen funds and a closed trail.
Frequently asked questions
Are losses really still rising?
Yes — and reported figures understate reality, because most victims never file. If you have not reported yet, your case is part of the missing data.
Does record volume mean my case will be ignored?
No. Volume has pushed banks and regulators to systematise handling. A well-documented claim moves through the process; it does not queue behind chaos.
Not sure where your situation fits?
Describe what happened in your own words. We will tell you honestly whether a cryptocurrency trading loss review is the right next step.